The Cabin In The Woods: It’s Not A Game-Changer…or a masterpiece

This is less of a review than an editorial. An editorial full of spoilers. I will write a mini-review to explain my thoughts about the film for the curious, but from then on I will be in spoiler territory; so tread carefully. If I am being strongly negative, it isn’t to say that the film lacks strong points, but that the strong points could have been emboldened.

To begin with, this article was inspired by three factors:

1.) Ultra Culture highlights my annoyance

2.) I have a lot more to say about 1.)

3.) At least one of my friend strongly disagrees

Here’s the mini-review for you spoiler-phobes out there who still want to see it cold. The plot is so much of a spoiler I can only tell you that five friends go off to a cabin and horror ensues.

The Cabin In The Woods (d. Goddard, 2012) is a wickedly funny thrill-ride that takes the horror genre and decides to mess around with it. Like Jigsaw from the SAW franchise would do to an unsuspecting attorney who freed a man who drowned some puppies, this film upturns convention and makes for an entertaining mix of zany insane thoughts and meta-commentary.

However, it never really packs a punch, either as a satire or even emotionally as it looks into the mechanics of horror rather than the people involved. While the deconstruction is a committed effort, the film does not justify the narrative turns that it takes at points. Sometimes, hammering the point home is better than implying, particular when other films have done similar things with more aplomb.

All in all, it isn’t the greatest of horror films, and it isn’t particularly biting, but The Cabin In The Woods is an entertaining film that you should go in to cold, without knowing anything.

HERE BE Spoilers.

Continue reading

You Must Hear This Episode 24 – Rideable

Yeehaw, giddy up and ride ‘em cowboy, because it’s another episode of YOU MUST HEAR THIS.

In a newsless triple-play, the boys tackle their first genre topic, westerns. So horses, gunplay, crooked sherrifs and nameless gunmen abound, and perhaps a good old shootout to round it all of, I’m sure. Totally not just an hour and a half of sucking up to things we love.

DOWNLOAD THE SHOW HERE
OR STREAM IT, cowboy, HERE:

SHOW NOTES:
-Discussed – Toy Story 3, Reccetear – an Item Shops Tale, Curzon on demand,
le Havre, This Must Be The Place, Red Cliff, every fighting game ever,
Romance is Boring (Max’s new podcast)
-Stings and Songs – The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Main Title by Ennio Morricone,
Wild Wild West by Will Smith feat. Dru Hill, This Must Be The Place by Talking Heads
-Links to RiB related material coming tomorrow, because TEETHING ISSUES WHOOPS!

-You can find Max over at his twitter and tumblr AND SOON IN OTHER PLACES
-You can find Milan over at his twitter and facebook
-You can find Tim over at his twitter and facebook

You Must Hear This Episode 23 – Uverble (say it!)

It’s a pun! BECAUSE IT SOUNDS LIKE UWE BOLL!
This episode, the boys tackle the world’s most infamous director/critics boxer in an extra-length return to normality!

DOWNLOAD THE SHOW HERE
I AM YOUR STREAM:

SHOW NOTES
Discussed – The Legend of Korra, Poor Poor Lips (Jmanga), The Voice, Anarchy My Dear, The Hunger Games, Black Dynamite (Again), Community, Once Upon a Time in the West, The Iron Lady, Civilisation V, Half Life 2
News – Teenage Mutant Ninja Aliens, Anchorman 2
Trailer Park – Safety Not Guaranteed, The Host
Song – Admit It Again by Say Anything
Stings – In the Name of the King, Bloodrayne, and Boll’s video about how Michael Bay is a retard

-You can find Max over at his twitter and tumblr
-You can find Milan over at his twitter and facebook
-You can find Tim over at his twitter and facebook

The Hunger Games (d. Ross, 2012)

When we are first introduced into the world of District 12, are met with images of the poverty disappearing into a raw green forest, guarded by a long de-electrificed fence, showing the escape that Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) experiences when she illegally hunts. She experiences freedom that the district does not afford her.

This is in constrast to the horror of fending for her life in a similar green forest that the Hunger Games takes place in. The mockery and bastardisation of the freedom that she craves. This film presents disfranchisement at its most brutal, where a society takes what is treasured and human, and making it either into a joke or seeks its destruction.

This gonzo civilisation that is presented to us is completely allegorical, as the ruins of the United States, Panem, are controlled by denizens that could exist in ‘Brazil’, in a place called The Captiol, where neon highlights are the norm and renaissance had too much nuance. Every year, twenty four ‘tributes’ between the ages of 12 to 18 are randomly drawn in a lottery to take part in the Hunger Games: a fight to the death inside of a specialised arena. Controlled by gamemasters with a holographic board, headed by Seneca Cane (Wes Bentley) , they make sure that this proto-American Idol is a ratings hit for the inhabitants of Panem and a horror film for the districts.

At the reaping, Katniss’ sister Prim (Willow Shields) is chosen but Katniss offers herself in her stead. From there, Katniss is plucked from her world head first into a bullet train from her district to Panem, and into the lap of Cinna (Lenny Kravitz). He fashions her into an icon, ‘the girl who was on fire’ and makes the public adore her. This is not just a competition for blood, but for likeability, which is exploited by Peeta (Josh Hutcherson), a fellow Tribute from her district, building a ‘star-crossed lovers’ narrative. As they get ready, they do not know what they are going to face in the arena, but as the popular motto goes, ‘may the odds be ever in your favour’.

The satire the film presents isn’t particularly strong, but the film’s ambition brings in definition, and raises interesting questions about our society, and a warning of what we could potentially become. With Katniss, an outsider of this world acting as our surrogate, we can accept this world that we are thrust into. It is with relief that we find that her character is very well-defined.

Lawrence applies her steely sensibilities that she utilized in ‘Winter’s Bone’ with aplomb, though at time Katniss and Ree Dolly seem interchangeable personality wise. Her performance acts as the anchor for the story, while not to the same calibre as her performance in ‘Winter’s Bone’, her subtle facial movements and determination become the source of the film’s strength, especially when The Capitol and the games becoming too unrealistic. It is refreshing to see a film with a strong female character who isn’t built on sexuality or overly masculine traits, but she stands heads and shoulders over the rest of the cast. It is not that they are terrible, but in comparison to Katniss, their characters are not given the permanence to adequately invest into, giving the film a lack of dramatic density.

Some critics have complained that the violence feels a bit bloodless under the PG-13/12A rating (I disagree until the final action sequence), but there is something more problematic in the editing than this. The film feels simultaneously truncated and overburdened, as it sacrifices dramatic tension to appease fans of the novel. The film commits to a break-neck speed through plot points, making it more of a filmed check-list than an artistic endeavour in avoiding fan backlash.

Gary Ross, who previously directed Pleasantville and Seabiscuit, attempts to adaptation the novel with rapid editing, blunt storytelling, and having the frame constantly move. While effective at moments, but on the whole, it makes it difficult to establish emotional connections between Katniss and the other characters. Coupled with some poor CGI, it also distracts us from the core themes the story tries to explore.

The Hunger Games is passable, with a strong central performance by Jennifer Lawrence, an inspired set-design, and entertaining allegory. However, as much as the mise-en-scene and scripting gives the film a forward momentum, it is to its disadvantage as the film is robbed of the emotional connection it needed by running down events like an ungainly steamroller.